صادق خادمی

وب‌سایت مرکزی
وب‌سایت مرکزی SadeghKhademi.ir خانه صفحه اصلی چت آرشیو آثار منابع و تحقیقات ارتباط با ما فرم تماس
در حال بارگذاری ...
منوی دسته بندی
← BACK TO LIBRARY

The Gate of Knowledge: The Portal to Understanding Divine Attributes and Epithets in Mystical Path

Adapted from the Lectures of , May His Sacred Soul Rest in Peace (Session 608)

Introduction

In the realm of Islamic mysticism, "the Gate of Knowledge" is a foundational stage that guides the seeker toward the recognition of the Divine Truth through its attributes and epithets. This station transcends mere intellectual knowledge and delves into a deeper, personal, and experiential understanding of the Divine. The present lecture, taken from session 608 of , may his soul rest in peace, explains the first stage of knowledge, that is, the recognition of Divine attributes and epithets, and by examining the two ways of attaining this knowledge, critiques the restrictive and limited views, thus paving the way for a deeper understanding of this mystical station.

Section 1: The Distinction Between Knowledge and Gnosis

Gnosis, in comparison to knowledge, is a deeper and more personal understanding of the truth. Knowledge refers to the comprehension of generalities and universals, such as when one says "I know something," but gnosis pertains to the understanding of particulars and individual truths, such as "I know Zaid." A mystic knows the truth personally and individually, while a philosopher or scholar addresses it generally, often accompanied by intellectual limitations. For example, knowledge is like a view from the top of a mountain that only shows the broad outlines of the landscape, while gnosis is like walking through the garden of truth where each flower is recognized by its unique fragrance and color. This distinction originates from the different approaches of mysticism and philosophy; mystical gnosis, through presence and immediacy, leads the seeker to nearness and unity with the Divine, whereas philosophical knowledge, due to its generality, lacks this immediacy.

Gnosis, unlike knowledge which is general, refers to the personal and direct apprehension of the truth, guiding the seeker toward divine proximity.

Section 2: The Three Stages of Gnosis and the First Stage

In Islamic mysticism, gnosis has three stages, the first of which is the recognition of Divine attributes and epithets. This stage serves as a gateway through which the seeker becomes familiar with the names and manifestations of the Divine, setting the stage for subsequent stages that bring them closer to the Divine Essence. emphasizes that this recognition is the most elementary step in the mystical path, and without it, certainty cannot be attained. This stage is akin to a seed planted in the soil of the seeker's being, which, in the later stages, transforms into a mighty tree of knowledge of the Divine Essence. Recognizing the Divine attributes and epithets directs the seeker toward an awareness of the Divine presence in the manifestations of creation and revelation, preparing them for deeper spiritual visions.

The first stage of gnosis, the recognition of Divine attributes and epithets, is the gateway to the mystical path and lays the foundation for certainty and closeness to the Divine.

Section 3: Two Ways to Attain Knowledge of Divine Attributes

Knowledge of Divine attributes can be attained through two means:

  1. The Scriptural Way: This way, revealed through the prophets and Divine law, introduces the seeker to the Divine attributes. For example, the following verses from Surah Al-Ikhlas: Say, 'He is Allah, [Who is] One; Allah, the Eternal Refuge. He neither begets nor is born; Nor is there to Him any equivalent.' (Surah Al-Ikhlas, 1-4) This way is based on revelation and prophethood, which introduces the seeker to the Divine attributes.
  2. Witnessing the Manifestations of Creation: In this path, the seeker observes Divine attributes within the details of creation. For instance, the color white is attributed to the Divine attribute of "Al-Zahir" (the Manifest), while the color black is linked to "Al-Batin" (the Hidden), or the delicate softness of a flower is seen as a reflection of the Divine beauty, and the sharpness of a thorn as a symbol of the Divine majesty.

These two ways are like two wings of a bird that lift the seeker toward the sky of gnosis. The scriptural way, grounded in revelation, provides a solid foundation, while witnessing the manifestations, through mystical insight, brings the truth to life in the heart of the seeker. At times, a discrepancy may arise between these two paths, as scripture may not mention all the Divine names, and the seeker might witness names that are not explicitly mentioned in scripture.

Knowledge of Divine attributes can be attained through two complementary means: the scriptural way (revelation) and the mystical witnessing of the manifestations of creation.

Section 4: Critique of the View That Divine Names Are Restricted

In contrast to the view held by some that Divine names are restricted and limited to those mentioned in scripture, argues that knowledge of Divine attributes goes beyond the current scripture. The Divine names, as stated in the Holy Qur'an, are innumerable (Allah has the most beautiful names), and the seeker may witness names that are not mentioned in the existing scripture or are beyond its scope. The current scripture has only revealed a portion of the Divine names for the guidance of humanity during the period of occultation, but with the advent of the Imam Mahdi (may Allah hasten his reappearance), more names will be revealed. This view is akin to opening a window to an infinite ocean of Divine names, of which the current scripture only shows a small portion. The seeker, through mystical insight, may gain access to names that are not found in the current scripture, signifying the dynamic and expansive nature of mystical knowledge.

Divine names are not restricted to the existing scripture; the seeker may witness names that are not explicitly mentioned in it.

Section 5: The Difference Between Attribute and Epithets in Islamic Mysticism

Although the terms "attribute" and "epithet" may appear similar, they differ in meaning and implication. An attribute is something that is added to the described object (the affected), and it can include both good and evil, truth or falsehood. An epithet, on the other hand, is something that is added to the one who describes (the agent), and it refers solely to good and truth, such that falsehood cannot be involved. In mysticism, an attribute refers to the Divine names, and an epithet refers to their meanings. For example, "Al-Jabbar" (the Compeller) is an attribute, as it might refer to the Divine majesty, while "Al-Jamal" (Beauty) is an epithet, as it refers to perfection and absolute goodness. Metaphorically, an attribute is like a mirror that sometimes reflects light and sometimes shadow, whereas an epithet is like the sun that only radiates light and warmth. Due to its connection to truth and goodness, an epithet is more noble than an attribute and holds a higher status in mysticism.

An epithet is exclusively linked to goodness and truth, making it nobler than an attribute, which can include both good and evil.

Sixth Section: Critique of the Books View on Adjective and Qualifier

The book *Maqamat al-Sairin* equates the terms "adjective" (صفت) and "qualifier" (نعت) in meaning, seeing their difference merely as a matter of being appended to the subject or the object. Nikounam (may his soul rest in peace) critiques this perspective, emphasizing the material and semantic differences between the two terms. He argues that the qualifier (نعت) is exclusively associated with goodness and truth, whereas the adjective (صفت) can also encompass evil. This critique pays heed to the literary and mystical commonalities and stresses the need for precision in mystical interpretations.

This critique is akin to polishing the gem of truth, preventing its confusion with formal concepts. The distinction between adjective and qualifier is not only evident in their identity but also in their mystical connotations. Ignoring this difference leads to confusion in knowledge.

Key Point: The adjective and qualifier differ both in substance and connotation; the qualifier pertains exclusively to goodness and truth, making the view of equating them incorrect.

Seventh Section: The Role of Divine Light and the Life of the Heart in Knowledge

The knowledge of divine attributes and qualities requires the illumination of the heart through divine light and the vitality of intellect. This light is attained through *tadbr* (illumination) and *husn nazar* (rightful view), which comprises two aspects: reverence, meaning the attention to the awe of the Creator (the Divine), and benevolent regard, meaning the focus on the divine manifestation and form. *Husn nazar* is a synthesis of these two aspects, obtained through the purity of the heart and the mystical effort of the seeker.

This light is like a lantern that illuminates the darkness of the heart, revealing the path to truth. The life of the heart is akin to fertile soil, wherein the seed of thought is sown, and, with divine light, it reaches a state of certain knowledge. This process is a prerequisite for progress in the subsequent stages of the mystical journey.

Key Point: Knowledge of the divine attributes and qualities is acquired through divine light, the vitality of the heart, and right regard, which necessitates effort and mystical insight.

Eighth Section: Limitations of the Existing Divine Law and the Dynamism of Knowledge

The current divine law (Shari'ah) only expresses a portion of the divine truth, not encompassing all the divine names and qualities. Some names may be beyond reach or have not been explicitly conveyed in the existing law. Nikounam (may his soul rest in peace) emphasizes that with the appearance of Imam Mahdi (peace be upon him), more names will be revealed, for the complete divine law is manifested in his being.

The existing law is like a spring sufficient to quench one's thirst, but the ocean of truth awaits the advent of the Promised Mahdi. This limitation does not signify a deficiency in the law but rather reflects the exigencies of the period of occultation, during which only a part of the truth has been revealed to guide humanity.

Key Point: The existing divine law conveys only part of the divine names, and with the emergence of Imam Mahdi (peace be upon him), the complete truth will be unveiled.

Ninth Section: The Challenge of Reconciling Literary and Mystical Discourses

If literary and philosophical discourses are overly emphasized, they may obscure the mystical truth of "witnessing" and "manifestation." Nikounam (may his soul rest in peace) stresses that reconciling these sciences requires balance, ensuring that the mystical truth does not become overshadowed by formal discussions. Mystical knowledge, more than being dependent on literary discourse, requires *shuhd* (witnessing) and *basrah* (insight) of the heart.

This balance is like walking on the edge of a blade, where the seeker must carefully align mystical truth with formal analysis. Becoming absorbed in literary discussions is like getting lost in a forest, unable to see the sunlight of truth.

Key Point: Reconciling literary and mystical discussions requires balance to ensure that the mystical truth is not overshadowed.

Tenth Section: Common Knowledge and Its Place in the Mystical Journey

The first stage of knowledge, which is the knowledge of divine attributes and qualities, is known as *ilm al-mmah* (common knowledge). This knowledge represents the most fundamental level of understanding in the mystical journey, without which certainty cannot be attained. Nikounam (may his soul rest in peace) emphasizes that those who limit themselves to mere knowledge of the outward (hir) are deprived of this knowledge, as true knowledge requires the presence and witnessing of the divine manifestations and aspects.This knowledge is like a foundation upon which the structure of the mystical journey is built. At this stage, the seeker becomes acquainted with the divine names and attributes, but has yet to reach the essence of the Divine. This understanding is a necessary step for entering higher stages of the journey.

Key Point: Common knowledge is the most basic form of knowledge, without which certainty is unattainable, and it guides the seeker toward witnessing the divine manifestations.

Conclusion

The chapter on knowledge, as one of the foundational stages of the mystical journey, guides the seeker toward the understanding of divine attributes and qualities through two paths: the legal and the experiential. Nikounam's (may his soul rest in peace) discourse, by explaining the first stage of knowledge, distinguishing between knowledge and certitude, and critiquing limited views, unveils the depth of this station. The differences between the adjective and qualifier, the role of divine light in the heart, and the limitations of the current law are key concepts in this discourse, enriched by literary metaphors and scientific analyses.