of Nekounam (Session 654)
The second gate of monotheism stands as a lofty peak in the mystical journey, a station where the seeker transcends the veils of apparent causes and rational proofs, arriving at the direct witnessing of the truths of divine unity. This station, known as the special monotheism (Tawhid Khass), guides the seeker towards a life of divine oneness, where all manifestations are revealed through the singular face of the divine reality. In this writing, the content of Lecture No. 654 is revisited with a scholarly, sophisticated approach, reformulated in an academic manner. Every detail of the lecture and its intricate analysis is presented with full explanation and utmost fidelity, so that, like a radiant torch, it illuminates the path of seekers towards the truth of Tawhid.
The second monotheism is a special form of Tawhid that is affirmed not through proofs but through truths: "And as for the second monotheism, which is proven through truths, it is the special monotheism." This form of Tawhid is realized by relinquishing the reliance on apparent causes, rising above intellectual disputes, and freeing oneself from attachment to rational evidence. In this state, the seeker is liberated from the confines of evidence and causes, reaching the direct witnessing of the unity of truth, where no influence other than the divine is perceived in existence. This station is akin to an endless sea where all causes and proofs are absorbed, and only the truth of divine unity manifests.
At this stage, the seeker witnesses the truth directly rather than relying on arguments, and becomes free from any intermediary. This liberation is like the breaking of chains from the soul's limbs, guiding the seeker towards freedom in the oneness of the divine.
Monotheism consists of three stages: the first stage is monotheism based on proofs and evidence, which exists within the realm of evidences; the second stage is monotheism based on truths, achieved without evidence, and realized within the realm of truths; and the third stage, though briefly mentioned, remains unexplained. These stages illustrate the ascending journey of the seeker from apparent Tawhid to esoteric Tawhid, as they move from appearances to truths, and from truths to higher stations. The first stage serves as the foundation, where the seeker reaches Tawhid through proofs and evidence. However, at the second stage, these foundations crumble, and the seeker attains the direct witnessing of the truths of unity, where proofs themselves become a veil to the truth. This ascent is akin to climbing a ladder made of proofs, yet at the summit, the seeker no longer needs the ladder and directly sees the truth without intermediaries.
The second monotheism represents a monotheistic life, which distinguishes the believer from the non-believer, much like the difference between the living and the dead. The seeker, at this station, perceives and witnesses this monotheistic life, as the truth of unity becomes manifest in their soul. This life is the essence of Tawhid, guiding the seeker to the direct witnessing of the truth of unity, like a light that dispels the darkness of duality. This life is like a spirit breathed into the body of the seeker, elevating them from the realm of the apparent dead to the realm of true life. At this stage, the seeker not only perceives life, but becomes life itself, as their entire being is immersed in the unity of the divine. This witnessing is like awakening from a deep sleep, leading the seeker to an eternal awakening in the presence of the divine.
The disbeliever, due to the lack of the monotheistic life, is considered impure, while the believer, due to possessing this life, is pure. This impurity is not in the sense of physical defilement, but rather due to the disbelievers stagnation in the embryonic stage and failure to ascend to the monotheistic life. The disbeliever is like a branch severed from the tree of life, now reduced to dead wood, whereas the believer is like a tree rooted in the soil of truth, with branches that reach towards the sky of unity. This distinction is not merely nominal but is real. The believer, upon attaining the monotheistic life, is freed from all duality and impurity, while the disbeliever remains ensnared in the darkness of disbelief and the embryonic state. This difference is like the contrast between a living sheep and dead meat; the living sheep has life, and its sanctity stems from this life, while the meat is lifeless and devoid of sanctity.
In jurisprudence, the impurity of the disbeliever, contrary to the view of some jurists who consider it political or nominal, is real and arises from the lack of the monotheistic life. The believer, whether alive or dead, is not impure, but the disbeliever is impure in both states. This impurity is attributed to the realm of disbelief, not to outward filth. The believer is like a pure spring, nourished by the truth of Tawhid, while the disbeliever is like an embryo that remains in its initial state, deprived of the monotheistic life. Some jurists have considered the impurity of the disbeliever to be nominal, but this view is like a structure built on a weak foundation, unable to explain the true nature of impurity. The impurity of the disbeliever stems from the lack of the monotheistic life, which keeps them in the lowly stage of the embryo, while the believer, by ascending to the monotheistic life, is freed from impurity.
The second monotheism is realized through the abandonment of apparent causes, meaning the seeker does not attribute the effects to the conventional causes and acknowledges no influence except for the divine: "It is that the seeker does not attribute the effects to the causes commonly known among people." This abandonment leads the seeker to witness the principle of "No cause but God," where all causes dissolve in the divine cause. This abandonment is akin to the removal of a veil from the seeker's eyes, freeing them from the captivity of apparent causes and revealing the divine truth directly. At this stage, the seeker no longer considers "ifs" and "maybes," but rather looks solely at the act of the divine, attributing all effects to it.
The seeker, by ascending beyond intellectual disputessuch as the debate over whether to see the world or the truthtranscends analogies and illusions, reaching the station of revelation: "The ascension beyond intellectual disputes." This ascension involves moving from the limitations of theoretical reason to the light of direct vision, as the seeker rises above intellectual quarrels, such as the debate, "Shall I see the world or the truth?" and attains the vision of the truth of unity. This ascension is like climbing a mountain, where at its peak, all intellectual disputes transform into the light of revelation. At this station, the seeker is liberated from analogies and illusions, and witnesses the truth directly, as theoretical reason becomes like a candle before the sun of vision.
In the second monotheism, the seeker becomes detached from evidence, as arguments, reliance, and means themselves become obstacles to witnessing the truth: "In Tawhid, do not witness any proof." The proof, which was the completion of the first stage, is now regarded as a form of polytheism in the second stage because it overshadows the true meaning. At this stage, the seeker is like a bird freed from the cage of evidence, soaring towards the sky of truth.