در حال بارگذاری ...
منوی دسته بندی
← BACK TO LIBRARY

Reflections on Divine Knowledge: The Greatest Name and the Wisdom of Praise






Reflections on Divine Knowledge: The Greatest Name and the Wisdom of Praise


of Nekounam, May His Sacred Spirit Be Sanctified (Session 35)

Introduction

This treatise, like a precious pearl in the ocean of divine knowledge, explores the concept of the Greatest Name and the distinction among praise (amd), commendation (mad), and gratitude (shukr). With a philosophical and mystical approach, the present lecture pursues two fundamental axes: firstly, elucidating the station of the Greatest Name as the foundation of all existential determinations, and secondly, analysing the epistemological and ontological differences among amd, mad, and shukr within the framework of Qur'anic knowledge. This work, articulated in a refined and scholarly language, presents the entire content of the lecture with detailed exposition for an erudite academic audience, while employing literary allegories and allusions to reveal the profundity and allure of the knowledge imparted.

Part One: The Greatest Name and the Determinations of Existence

1.1. The Concept of Name and Its Position in Divine Knowledge

The concept of name in divine knowledge functions as a key that encompasses all existential determinations within itself. In Arabic literature, the name (ism) is regarded as an independent and more comprehensive category than the verb (fil) and particle (arf), possessing a special station. Unlike the verb, which depends on conjugation, and the particle, which lacks independent semantic capacity, the name possesses intrinsic independence and eloquence. In philosophy and mysticism, the name transcends even the notion of existence, since existence itself is a name.

1.2. The Greatest Name and the Unity of Divine Names

The Divine Names, such as Allah, Ar-Rahman (The Merciful), and Ar-Rahim (The Compassionate), all fall under the broader concept of the name. A narration from Bihar al-Anwar (Volume 91, page 52) reports a supplication invoking بِعِزِّ ذَلِكَ الْاِسْمِ الَّذِي مَلَأْتَ كُلَّ شَيْءٍ دُونَكَ (by the honour of that Name which has filled all things except You). This Greatest Name encompasses all existential determinations except the Essence of the Truth, which remains inaccessible to the creatures.

Key Point: The Greatest Name acts as a mirror reflecting all existential determinations except the Essence of the Truth, manifesting the unity of Divine Names within their apparent multiplicity.

1.3. The Spiritual Path of the Greatest Name

The spiritual journey towards the Greatest Name is arduous and fraught with peril, necessitating the purification of the self and concentration upon the invocation of Divine Names. The repetition of O Name or particular Divine Names functions as a key capable of unlocking the existential receptacle of the seeker; however, the efficacy of this invocation depends upon the spiritual readiness and suitability of the seekers being. Should the seekers receptacle be unprepared, this invocation will bear no fruit and must be relinquished.

Key Point: The spiritual path of the Greatest Name is akin to ascending a lofty summit attainable only through the purification of the self and existential suitability.

Part Two: The Difference Between the Prophetic Path and Jurisprudential Sciences

2.1. The Ontological Nature of the Prophetic Path

The path of the Prophets, as a pure stream issuing from the fountain of divine truth, possesses an ontological and granted nature. This path is connected directly to the divine origin and is independent of formal instruments. By virtue of this connection, the Prophets are capable of realising truths such as miracles (karamt), for example, reviving the dead, which surpass the capacity of formal sciences.

2.2. The Preparatory Role of Jurisprudential Sciences

The jurisprudential sciences serve as a launchpad with a preparatory and facilitative role. These sciences, employing reasoning and proof, demonstrate the intellectual and juridical possibility of prophetic teachings, yet the actual realisation of these truths lies beyond the scope of formal instruments.

2.3. The Limitations of Jurisprudential Sciences

Due to their acquisitive and formal nature, jurisprudential sciences are capable only of elucidating the possibility of divine knowledge and cannot lead to its attainment or realisation. These sciences defend the possibility and rationality of prophetic teachings against worldly doubts and denials, yet the actualisation of such matters pertains to the domain of the actions of Prophets and Saints.

2.4. Jurisprudential Sciences in the Age of Occultation

During the Age of Occultation, when Prophets and Immaculate Ones lack physical presence, jurisprudential sciences remain the sole available tool, fulfilling a preparatory and facilitative role. These sciences provide the blueprint and rules of the prophetic path and play a vital role in preserving the continuity of divine knowledge.

Key Point: Jurisprudential sciences act as a bridge between the eras of presence and occultation, serving a preparatory function in the transmission of prophetic knowledge, whereas the realisation of divine truths requires an existential spiritual journey.

Part Three: The Distinction Between Praise (amd), Commendation (Mad), and Gratitude (Shukr)

3.1. Epistemological Differences Among amd, Mad, and Shukr

amd, mad, and shukr all fall within the domain of praise and gratitude, yet possess epistemological and ontological distinctions:

3.2. The Superiority of amd Over Mad and Shukr

amd, owing to its exclusivity to rational and volitional beings and its inclusion of humility, sanctification, and glorification, is superior to mad and shukr. Mad, by encompassing non-rational entities, and shukr, by its dependence on blessings, occupy a lower rank.

3.3. amd and Tasb in the Noble Qur'an

In the Noble Qur'an, amd is accompanied by tasb (glorification). The verse وَلَمْ يَكُن لَّهُ شَرِيكٌ فِي الْمُلْكِ (and He has no partner in dominion) (Al-Isr, 17:111) expresses sanctification and glorification within praise. Moreover, the verse وَإِن مِّن شَيْءٍ إِلَّا يُسَبِّحُ بِحَمْدِهِ (and there is nothing except that it glorifies His praise) (Al-Isr, 17:44) demonstrates that amd encompasses tasb and sanctification.

Key Point: amd, by virtue of including humility, sanctification, and glorification, is the most excellent form of praise, negating imperfection from the praised and aligned with Qur'anic tasb.

Part Four: The Limitations of Religious Knowledge and the Prophetic Path

4.1. Intentional Conciseness and Ambiguity in the Speech of the Infallibles

The Infallibles, when articulating profound truths, employ intentional conciseness and ambiguity to prevent misuse or distortion. This brevity does not indicate negligence but rather constitutes a conscious strategy to protect the sanctity of the knowledge.

4.2. The Limitations of Religious Knowledge in Recognising Divine Names

Religious knowledge, due to its acquisitive nature, faces limitations in fully apprehending the Divine Names. This constraint arises from the incongruity between the existential capacity of religious scholars and the depth of divine knowledge.

Key Point: Religious knowledge, due to its formal nature, provides only the preliminaries for recognising the Divine Names, whereas realisation of their truth requires an existential spiritual journey.

Final Summary

This treatise, like a radiant torch, has elucidated two principal axes of divine knowledge: the concept of the Greatest Name and the distinction between amd, mad, and shukr. The Greatest Name, as the essence of all existential determinations except the Essence of the Truth, serves as the pivot of the unity of Divine Names, the path to which is perilous and demands purification of the self. Religious sciences, as preparatory tools, rationally and juridically validate the prophetic knowledge, yet the realisation of these truths lies within the domain of the existential journey of Prophets and Saints. amd, by encompassing humility, sanctification, and glorification, is the most superior form of praise, consistent with Qur'anic tasb. This work, through a comprehensive and exalted analysis, clarifies divine knowledge for an erudite audience and paves the way for deeper reflections.

Supervised by Sadegh Khademi