of Nokounam, , Session Sixty-Eight
Surah Al-Fatiha, as the epitome of Quranic knowledge, in its sixth verse,
ٱهْدِنَا ٱلصِّرَٰطَ ٱلْمُسْتَقِيمَ(Al-Fatiha: 6)
meaning Guide us to the straight path, expresses one of the most profound supplications of the servant to God. This verse, focusing on the concept of guidance, raises a fundamental question: Can divine guidance pertain to evil? This treatise, adopting a scientific and spiritual approach, elucidates the nature of guidance on two primary and secondary levels, critiques traditional viewpoints, and offers a comprehensive and coherent principle consistent with the Quranic verses and rational principles. The aim is to provide an analysis that facilitates deep reflection on the concept of guidance for specialised audiences.
The interpretation of the Holy Quran must be founded on two pillars: scientific discussions that offer coherent and generalisable rules, and spiritual discussions that penetrate the inner and soulful layers of the verses. Every Quranic discourse must avoid generalities and be based on rules applicable in all cases.
Many existing interpretations, due to the lack of scientific backing, rely on mere preference or are influenced by specific orientations. The responses offered to Quranic questions sometimes lack strong reasoning and consistent rules.
Interpretative rules must be fixed, generalisable, and incontrovertible to address profound theological and spiritual questions. These rules protect interpretation from dispersion and personal preference.
This section emphasised the necessity of grounding interpretation on the dual axes of science and spirituality. The critique of non-scientific and preferential interpretations paves the way for presenting a coherent rule in explaining guidance. This approach elevates interpretation to a level that is both rational and spiritual.
The central question of this discussion is the possibility or impossibility of divine guidance to evil. Can it be said that God guides a servant to evil, or is this incompatible with divine justice and mercy?
Raghib Isfahani likened guidance to evil to glad tidings and considered it metaphorical, such as the verse:
بَشِّرْهُمْ بِعَذَابٍ أَلِيمٍ(Al-Imran: 21)
meaning Give them glad tidings of a painful punishment. However, guidance, unlike glad tidings, is always real and cannot merely be metaphorical.
Guidance in the verse
ٱهْدِنَا ٱلصِّرَٰطَ ٱلْمُسْتَقِيمَ
means il (delivering to the destination), not merely provision or origination. Il can be creative (such as intrinsic guidance of creatures) or legislative (such as guidance via Sharia).
Il (delivery to destination) differs from provision (showing the path). Divine guidance is il, meaning God delivers the servant to the destination, while provision might not necessarily lead to delivery.
Divine guidance divides into two types: primary guidance, which is Gods general grace guiding all creatures to good, and secondary guidance, which depends on the servants deeds and may lead to good or evil.
This section, by posing the question of the possibility of guidance to evil, provided a comprehensive rule defining guidance as il. The critique of Raghibs viewpoint and the distinction between il and provision highlight the depth of this analysis. Primary and secondary guidance form a coherent framework for understanding Quranic verses related to guidance.
Primary guidance, associated with Gods attributes of beauty (such as mercy and compassion), is Gods general grace that guides all creatures to good before the servant performs any act.
Secondary guidance, related to Gods majestic attributes (such as justice and power), results from the servants actions. The verse
وَٱللَّهُ لَا يَهْدِى ٱلْقَوْمَ ٱلظَّٰلِمِينَ(Al-Baqarah: 258)
meaning And God does not guide the wrongdoing people, negates primary guidance to good for the wrongdoers but confirms secondary guidance to evil.
Misguidance (ill), like guidance, depends on divine delivery and no being (even Iblis or the commanding self) can cause misguidance without Gods will. The verse
فَمَن تَوَلَّىٰ فَإِنَّهُ يُضِلُّهُ وَيَهْدِيهِ إِلَىٰ عَذَابِ ٱلسَّعِيرِ(Hajj: 4)
meaning So whoever turns away, He will misguide him and guide him to the burning punishment, shows secondary guidance to evil.
The terrestrial realm is the realm of causes, but all causes depend on the First Cause (God). Prophets, Imams, and even Iblis act within the framework of divine delivery.
The supplication in
ٱهْدِنَا ٱلصِّرَٰطَ ٱلْمُسْتَقِيمَ
is continuous even for the learned and the believers. The verse
يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا آمِنُوا(An-Nisa: 136)
meaning O you who have believed, believe, emphasises the ongoing need for guidance.
All existence is under divine delivery and no being can guide or misguide without Gods will. The verse
إِنَّكَ لَا تَهْدِي مَنْ أَحْبَبْتَ وَلَٰكِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يَهْدِي مَن يَشَاءُ(Qasas: 56)
meaning You do not guide whom you love, but God guides whom He wills, confirms this principle.
Secondary guidance results from the servants deeds and free will. God guides the servant to good or evil according to their actions, but this guidance remains within the framework of divine justice.
This section explained guidance on two levels: primary and secondary. Primary guidance is Gods general grace inviting all to good, whereas secondary guidance results from the servants deeds. The lack of independence of misguidance and the dependence of causes on the First Cause reinforces divine unity of actions. The supplication for guidance remains a continuous need even for the learned.
The verse
ٱهْدِنَا ٱلصِّرَٰطَ ٱلْمُسْتَقِيمَ
as a radiant gem in Surah Al-Fatiha, manifests the supplication for guidance to the straight path. Divine guidance, understood as delivery to the destination, occurs on two levels: primary (general grace) and secondary (dependent on deeds). The critique of traditional views, such as likening guidance to glad tidings, and the presentation of a coherent rule distinguish this interpretation from mere preferences. Secondary guidance, which can lead to evil, is within the framework of divine justice and the result of the servants actions. This analysis, emphasising divine unity of actions and the continuous need for guidance, invites the servant to reflect on their relationship with the Lord and seek ever-increasing illumination.
Under the supervision of Sadegh Khademi