صادق خادمی

وب‌سایت مرکزی
وب‌سایت مرکزی SadeghKhademi.ir خانه صفحه اصلی چت آرشیو آثار منابع و تحقیقات ارتباط با ما فرم تماس
در حال بارگذاری ...
منوی دسته بندی
← BACK TO LIBRARY

Scientific and Philosophical Exegesis of the Verses on the Knowledge of Names, Vicegerency, and Injustice in Surah Al-Baqarah: Clarifying the Position of Man, Infallibility, and the System of Retribution






Scientific and Philosophical Exegesis of the Verses on the Knowledge of Names, Vicegerency, and Injustice in Surah Al-Baqarah


Introduction

The verses pertaining to the knowledge of names, Adams vicegerency, and injustice in Surah Al-Baqarah are among the most fundamental Quranic verses elucidating the ontological status of humanity, its epistemic capacities, and its relationship with the divine system of creation. These verses, through explicating concepts such as vicegerency, the knowledge of names, prophetic infallibility, and injustice as existential deprivation, provide a comprehensive framework for understanding Islamic anthropology, Quranic practical wisdom, and the responsibilities incumbent upon religious knowledge. This treatise adopts a scientific and philosophical approach to systematically analyse these verses, integrating lecture content and exegetical analyses to furnish a coherent and academic text for researchers and specialised audiences. The structure comprises main sections with specialised subtitles, independent conclusions for each part, and a final synthesis, all composed in a refined language befitting the academic milieu. The objective is to present a profound and operative viewpoint which, while preserving all the original content details, enriches the literary and scientific value of the text with elevated metaphors and allusions.

Section One: Adams Vicegerency and the Knowledge of Names

Announcement of Vicegerency and the Angels Inquiry

"And when your Lord said to the angels, Indeed, I will make upon the earth a vicegerent. They said, Will You place upon it one who causes corruption therein and sheds blood, while we declare Your praise and sanctify You? He said, Indeed, I know that which you do not know." (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:30)

This verse pronounces the divine declaration appointing Adam as the vicegerent on earth. The angels objection, aware of humanitys capacity for corruption and bloodshed, does not stem from disobedience but from epistemic limitation. Due to their inability to comprehend the totality of human existencesimultaneously capable of corruption and infallibilitythey posed this question. The divine response, "Indeed, I know that which you do not know," signifies Gods wisdom in choosing man, a wisdom rooted in his unparalleled capacities such as the ability to receive the knowledge of names and actualise the station of vicegerency.

The angels objection to Adams vicegerency originates from their epistemic limitation in understanding the comprehensive existence of man, i.e., the simultaneous capacity for corruption and infallibility.

Teaching of the Names and Human Distinction

"And He taught Adam the namesall of them. Then He displayed them to the angels and said, Inform Me of the names of these, if you are truthful." (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:31)

The instruction of all the names to Adam indicates the grant of unparalleled knowledge that distinguishes him from other creatures. These names transcend the superficial denominations of objects to include esoteric and divine knowledges, including the essential, the unique, and the reserved names that angels could not comprehend. This knowledge forms the epistemological foundation of Adams vicegerency and demonstrates his capacity to realise elevated divine ranks.

The knowledge of names includes esoteric and divine knowledge inaccessible to the angels and manifests human eligibility for vicegerency.

The Angels Epistemic Limitation

They said, Exalted are You; we have no knowledge except what You have taught us. Indeed, it is You who is the Knowing, the Wise. (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:32)

This admission reveals the angels epistemic limitation in the face of the knowledge of names. Although possessing vast knowledge themselves, they were incapable of apprehending the hidden names embedded in human existential ranks. This distinction affirms mans ontological superiority as a composite being with the ability to receive divine knowledge and fulfil vicegerency.

The angels epistemic limitation concerning the knowledge of names underscores mans existential superiority and his eligibility for divine vicegerency.

Human Existential Comprehensiveness

Man, owing to his existential comprehensiveness, inherently encompasses the simultaneous capacities for both corruption and infallibility. This comprehensiveness, manifested in the potential and actual attributes shared between the infallible and the corrupt human, qualifies him for divine vicegerency. The infallible human attains ranks of immunity, guardianship, prophethood, and leadership, whereas the corrupt remains at lower existential stages. This duality, akin to two sides of a coin, reflects divine wisdom in human creation.

Human existential comprehensiveness, encompassing the concurrent capacities for corruption and infallibility, forms the basis for his eligibility for divine vicegerency.

Section Conclusion

The verses on vicegerency and the knowledge of names elucidate mans exalted status as Gods vicegerent. The angels objection arises from their epistemic limitation, whereas the impartation of the knowledge of names to Adam reveals his unparalleled capacity to receive divine knowledge. Mans existential comprehensiveness, integrating the capacities for corruption and infallibility, qualifies him for vicegerency. This section provides a foundational framework for subsequent analyses concerning injustice, infallibility, and the system of retribution.

Section Two: Injustice, Infallibility, and the System of Retribution

The Concept of Injustice in the Holy Quran

"And We said, O Adam, dwell, you and your spouse, in Paradise and eat from wherever you will but do not approach this tree, lest you be among the wrongdoers." (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:35)

The phrase "lest you be among the wrongdoers" introduces injustice as the consequence of approaching the forbidden tree. Here, injustice is not construed as conventional sin but rather as existential deprivation and estrangement from a higher rank (such as the heavenly station). This concept originates within the realm of corporeality, encompassing human existential limitations.

Injustice in the Quran signifies existential deprivation and estrangement from perfection, which in the corporeal realm may be ascribed even to the prophets.

The Non-Contradiction of Injustice with Infallibility

Attributing injustice to prophets, including Adam, does not conflict with their infallibility, since injustice in this context means existential deprivation rather than intentional sin or transgression. Prophetic infallibility entails immunity from deliberate sin and epistemic error but does not exempt them from corporeal existential limitations that result in deprivation. This infallibility is moral and contingent, positioning prophets as servants of God who remain ontologically distant from absolute divine perfection.

Prophetic infallibility is contingent and moral; the attribution of injustice to them, understood as existential deprivation, does not contradict this infallibility.

Gods Exception from Injustice

"And He is not unjust to His servants." (Surah Aal-Imran, 3:182)

The use of the term "ظَلَّامٍ" (excessive injustice) denies any deficiency or deprivation in the divine essence. This distinction sets God apart as the source of absolute perfection in contrast to created beings who experience varying degrees of deprivation within the corporeal realm.

God, as the source of absolute perfection, is free from any form of injustice or deprivation, unlike creatures who face limitations in the corporeal realm.

Injustice as a Concept with Gradation

Injustice is a concept admitting gradation, ranging from minor deprivation in prophets to infinite estrangement in typical wrongdoers such as Pharaoh and Nimrod. This spectrum, analogous to monetary denominations from a single unit to billions, varies in intensity but fundamentally denotes distance from truth and perfection. In prophets, injustice connotes relative limitation in existential ranks, while in wrongdoers it culminates in complete deviation from truth.

Injustice, as a concept admitting gradation, spans from minor deprivation in prophets to infinite estrangement in common wrongdoers.

Conditional and Actual Injustice

The attribution of injustice to prophets, both conditionally (suspended) and actually, is permissible and does not contradict their infallibility. Conditional injustice, as exemplified in Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:35, serves as a divine admonition to avoid deprivation, whereas actual injustice refers to the occurrence of deprivation as a consequence of action. This distinction reflects Quranic precision in elucidating the relationship between deeds and retribution.

Both conditional and actual injustice are attributed to prophets and are compatible with their infallibility.

Injustice in Other Verses

"And do not invoke besides Allah that which neither benefits you nor harms you. But if you did, then indeed you would be of the wrongdoers." (Surah Yunus, 10:106)

"And if you obey their desires after what has come to you of knowledge, indeed, you would then be among the wrongdoers." (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:145)

These verses associate conditional injustice with the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), warning against polytheism and estrangement from divine perfection. They underscore the prophetic model of perfection and remain consistent with his infallibility.

The conditional attribution of injustice to the Prophet in Surahs Yunus and Al-Baqarah functions as a warning against deprivation and estrangement from perfection.

Critique of Traditional Lexicography

Traditional lexicons are inadequate for explicating Quranic vocabulary such as injustice due to their failure to consider contextual and specialised meanings. The Quran, as the divine lexicon, provides precise, context-sensitive definitions that distinguish its terminology from general, non-specialised interpretations. Injustice in the Quran signifies deprivation, obscuration, and estrangement from truth, encompassing various degrees.

The Quran, as the divine lexical authority, delineates the meanings of injustice with precise, context-sensitive detail.

Section Conclusion

Injustice in the Quran denotes existential deprivation and estrangement from perfection, attributed to prophets conditionally or actually, without contradiction to their moral infallibility. God, as the source of absolute perfection, is free from injustice. The concept admits gradation, encompassing prophets to typical wrongdoers. Verses in Yunus and Al-Baqarah articulate conditional injustice, revealing divine wisdom in admonishing the highest creation.

Section Three: The Degrees of the Knowledge of Names and Human Evolution

Degrees of Divine Names

Divine names are classified into various degrees: