در حال بارگذاری ...
منوی دسته بندی
← BACK TO LIBRARY

Excerpts from the Lectures of Nokounam - Session 461






Comprehensive Guideline for Precise and Specialized Translation of Persian Texts into English


Introduction

Verse 145 of Surah Al-Baqarah holds an exalted position within the jurisprudential and epistemological framework of the Holy Qur'an, elucidating profound concepts of oppression, light, darkness, and existential gradations. This verse, by alluding to the incapacity of some People of the Book to accept the Qiblah of the Noble Prophet (PBUH) due to lack of auditory reception and ethnic prejudices, presents a constellation of Quranic teachings in the form of a warning to the Prophet and an exposition of the hierarchies of oppression and light. The present rewriting, adopting a scholarly and systematic approach, meticulously compiles the entire content of the lecture and its analyses in an exalted format befitting highly educated and specialised audiences. The objective is to provide a text that serves as a valuable resource in the fields of Quranic exegesis, Islamic philosophy, and Shi'a theology. Employing refined Persian metaphors and allegories, this writing endeavours to maintain scientific authenticity while possessing literary appeal.

Section One: Text and Translation of Verse 145 of Surah Al-Baqarah

Verse Text

وَلَئِنْ أَتَيْتَ الَّذِينَ أُوتُوا الْكِتَابَ بِكُلِّ آيَةٍ مَا تَبِعُوا قِبْلَتَكَ ۚ وَمَا أَنْتَ بِتَابِعٍ قِبْلَتَهُمْ ۚ وَمَا بَعْضُهُمْ بِتَابِعٍ قِبْلَةِ بَعْضٍ ۚ وَلَئِنِ اتَّبَعْتَ أَهْوَاءَهُمْ مِنْ بَعْدِ مَا جَاءَكَ مِنَ الْعِلْمِ إِنَّكَ إِذًا لَمِنَ الظَّالِمِينَ

Translation

"And if you were to bring to those who were given the Scripture every sign, they would not follow your Qiblah; nor are you to follow their Qiblah, nor are some of them to follow the Qiblah of others. And if you were to follow their desires after the knowledge that has come to you, indeed, you would then be among the wrongdoers."

Verse Analysis

Key Point: Verse 145 of Surah Al-Baqarah, by referring to the incapacity of the People of the Book to accept the Prophets Qiblah due to lack of epistemic reception and ethnic prejudices, emphasises the legitimacy of the Prophets Qiblah and his infallibility. The conditional warning to the Prophet against following the desires of the People of the Book presents oppression as an earthly and hypothetical attribute for the Prophet.

The verse, in its initial segment, points to the inability of the People of the Book to accept the Prophets Qiblah; in the subsequent conditional tone, it warns the Prophet to avoid succumbing to their desires. From the perspective of Quranic sciences, this verse elucidates the epistemic limitations of the People of the Book and the Prophets infallibility in resisting carnal desires. The application of the term "wrongdoers" to the Prophet is conditional and hypothetical, signifying the impossibility of his deviation from the truth.

Section Two: Hierarchies of Oppression and Reception in the Qur'anic Epistemological System

Lack of Reception among the People of the Book

Key Point: The lack of reception in the People of the Book stems from ethnic prejudices, regression, or modernism, obstructing acceptance of the truth and the Prophets Qiblah. This epistemic deficiency is rooted in Quranic psychology and denotes an incapacity to hear the truth.

The People of the Book, due to ethnicity, prejudice, or negligence, have lost the capacity to receive divine verses. From the standpoint of Quranic psychology, reception is intellectual and heartfelt acceptance, which prejudices, as epistemic barriers, deprive a person of perceiving the truth. This deficiency is analogous to an epistemic deafness that hinders acceptance of the Prophets Qiblah.

The Tangibility of Blindness versus the Intangibility of Deafness

Socially, blindness (visual impairment) is tangible and can be identified and remedied with aids such as spectacles; however, deafness (auditory impairment) is intangible and less noticed. From the perspective of religious sociology, this distinction alludes to a misprioritisation in attention to physical deficiencies while neglecting epistemic defects. Deafness, as an incapacity to accept the truth, is more pervasive than blindness.

Severity of Deafness Compared to Blindness

Key Point: Epistemic deafness, due to its prevalence and deeper impact on human guidance, is more severe than physical blindness. This defect requires purification of the self and epistemic reform.

Psychologically, deafness is more widespread than blindness. Auditory weakness, resulting from factors such as prejudice, negligence, and ignorance, is prevalent. From Quranic psychology, deafness signifies an inability to hear the truth and accept guidance, exerting a more profound influence on human direction.

Heartbreak and Leg Fracture

Socially, leg fractures are palpable and elicit sympathy, whereas heartbreak is intangible and even subject to ridicule, although heartbreak, as a spiritual and epistemic injury, is more severe than leg fractures. From the standpoint of Quranic ethics, this perspective emphasises the necessity of attention to psychological and epistemic health.

Incurability of Deafness

Unlike blindness, humans do not strive to cure epistemic deafness. The absence of equivalent aids, such as spectacles for deafness, signifies negligence toward this defect. From Quranic sciences, inner deafness requires purification of the self, whereas hearing aids only treat superficial deafness.

Section Three: The Prophets Infallibility and Disappointment with the People of the Book

The Prophets Disappointment with the People of the Book

Key Point: Verse 145, by emphasising the People of the Books inability to accept the Qiblah due to epistemic deafness, discourages the Prophet from futile efforts to convince them and stresses focus on those receptive to guidance.

The Holy Quran, by outlining the People of the Books incapacity to accept the Qiblah, dissuades the Prophet from exerting futile persuasion. This despair refers to the epistemic limitations of the People of the Book and the necessity for the Prophet to concentrate on the receptive.

Lack of Mutual Following

The Prophet (PBUH) cannot follow the Qiblah of the People of the Book just as they do not follow his Qiblah. This lack of mutual following stems from the legitimacy of the Prophets Qiblah and the epistemic deafness of the People of the Book. Theologically, this signifies the