صادق خادمی

وب‌سایت مرکزی
وب‌سایت مرکزی SadeghKhademi.ir خانه صفحه اصلی چت آرشیو آثار منابع و تحقیقات ارتباط با ما فرم تماس
در حال بارگذاری ...
منوی دسته بندی
← BACK TO LIBRARY

Analytical Perspective on Verse 268 of Surah Al-Baqarah






Analytical Perspective on Verse 268 of Surah Al-Baqarah


Introduction

Verse 268 of Surah Al-Baqarah, akin to a brilliant gem within the constellation of the Holy Quranic verses, examines the causes and factors of social and moral deviations, elucidating the roles of Satan and the self in engendering poverty and immorality. It introduces the divine promise of forgiveness and grace as the pathway to liberation from these afflictions. This verse not only analyses the external and internal factors of human misguidance, but also, through a practical approach, offers strategies for self-purification and societal reform. This treatise, with a profound focus on the content of the lecture, investigates the verse from Quranic, philosophical, psychological, and sociological perspectives, integrating scientific analyses to expound its theoretical and practical dimensions. The structure of this work is arranged in systematic sections with specialised titles and subtitles, designed to be engaging and utilitarian for researchers in religious sciences, students, and specialists in epistemological domains.

Text and Translation of the Verse

الشَّيْطَانُ يَعِدُكُمُ الْفَقْرَ وَيَأْمُرُكُمْ بِالْفَحْشَاءِ ۖ وَاللَّهُ يَعِدُكُمْ مَغْفِرَةً مِنْهُ وَفَضْلًا ۗ وَاللَّهُ وَاسِعٌ عَلِيمٌ

Satan threatens you with poverty and commands you to commit immorality, while God promises you forgiveness from Himself and bounty. And God is All-Encompassing, All-Knowing.

Analytical Dimensions of the Verse

1. The Practical Methodology of the Holy Quran: From Causes to Reasons

The Holy Quran, like a guiding light, in verse 268 of Surah Al-Baqarah, moves from mall (practical injunctions such as almsgiving) to ilal (causes such as the role of Satan and the self). This methodology, contrary to purely theoretical approaches, emphasises pragmatism and demonstrates that Quranic concepts acquire meaning not in isolation but within the framework of action. This verse, by clarifying the manner of almsgiving and avoidance of ostentation, stresses the necessity of righteous action prior to theoretical analysis.

Key Point: The Quranic methodology, by prioritising action over concept, links knowledge to power and social impact.
Conclusion: This methodology invites researchers to reconsider purely theoretical approaches and focus on the practical application of religious sciences, thereby enhancing the social influence of religion.

2. Critique of Conceptual Approach and Emphasis on Action

The Holy Quran, like a mirror reflecting truth, utilises concepts in service of action. The lecture underscores that knowledge without action is like a mirage that does not quench the thirsty. This perspective criticises purely theoretical approaches prevalent in some academic circles and insists on the necessity of linking knowledge with action.

Key Point: True knowledge is that which culminates in action; otherwise, it remains within the realm of illusion and fantasy.
Conclusion: This critique encourages scholars of religious sciences to rethink educational and research methods so that religious knowledge transforms into a tool for social transformation.

3. Knowledge and Power: Criterion of the True Scholar

Knowledge, like a double-edged sword, is valuable only when it leads to power and action. The lecture regards a scholar devoid of the capacity to effect change as lacking scientific competence. The true scholar is likened to a gardener who cultivates the sapling of knowledge into the fruit of action.

Key Point: A scholar without the power to act is trapped within the sphere of imagination and estranged from the reality of knowledge.
Conclusion: This viewpoint stresses the necessity of empowering religious scholars in social and practical domains.

4. Statistical Analysis of Quranic Concepts

The lecture, employing a statistical approach, counts the frequency of key terms in the Holy Quran, demonstrating that poverty appears 14 times, immorality 24 times, and Satan 89 times. This data indicates the predominance of Satan as a root cause over poverty and immorality, which are considered effects.

Key Point: Satan, mentioned 89 times, appears more than twice as often as the combined total of poverty and immorality (38 mentions) in the Quran.
Conclusion: This statistical analysis underscores the importance of focusing on root causes (Satan) rather than effects (poverty and immorality).

5. The Global Poverty Crisis

The lecture describes poverty as a deep wound upon the body of humanity, noting that over one billion people suffer from hunger and approximately 200 million perish annually due to starvation. This reality necessitates immediate action to alleviate poverty.

Key Point: Poverty, as a pervasive scourge, ensnares over one billion humans within its grasp.
Conclusion: This crisis calls religious scholars to strive for social justice and the eradication of deprivation.

6. Immorality: A Multiplying Agent of Corruption

Immorality, mentioned 24 times in the Quran, plays a role twice as impactful as poverty (14 mentions) in fostering corruption and ruin. This concept resembles a fire that consumes the moral foundations of society, necessitating urgent ethical confrontation.

Key Point: Immorality, with double the influence compared to poverty, devastates the ethical foundations of society.
Conclusion: This analysis highlights the imperative of reinforcing morality within society.

7. Satan: The Predominant Cause

Satan, with 89 mentions, stands as a dark shadow dominating poverty and immorality. This dominance signifies the pivotal role of Satan in human misguidance.

Key Point: Satan is referenced more than twice as often as poverty and immorality combined, as the agent of misguidance in the Quran.
Conclusion: This necessitates precise knowledge of Satan and methods of counteracting his influence.

8. Critique of Denial of Satan in Western Culture

The lecture critiques Western culture for denying Satan, emphasising that belief in Satan within Islamic culture serves as a tool for recognising and combating deviations.

Key Point: Faith in Satan functions as an instrument for recognising deviations and reinforcing Islamic identity.
Conclusion: This critique highlights the necessity of preserving religious identity against opposing cultures.

9. Distinction Between Satan and Iblis: Type and Individual

The lecture distinguishes Satan (a category encompassing jinn and humans, mentioned 89 times) from Iblis (a particular jinn entity, mentioned 11 times), identifying Iblis as a living being, comparable to Jesus or Khidr (peace be upon them).

Key Point: Satan is a general type, whereas Iblis is a specific and living personality of the jinn.
Conclusion: This distinction aids in a more precise understanding of the spiritual enemies of humanity.

10. Internal and External Satan

The lecture divides Satan into two types: external (Iblis and devils, mentioned 100 times) and internal (the self, mentioned 279 times). The self, with greater destructive capacity, is identified as humanitys principal adversary.

Key Point: The self, mentioned 279 times, is more dangerous than external Satan (100 mentions).
Conclusion: This analysis underscores the central role of the self in guiding or misleading humans.

11. The Self: The Principal Enemy

The self, mentioned 279 times in the Holy Quran, resembles a sleeping dragon within humans that can lead them either to the pinnacle of guidance or the abyss of misguidance. The lecture, citing a tradition from an Infallible, regards the self as the most hostile enemy of man.

Narration: Your most hostile enemy is the self that resides between your two ribs.

Conclusion: This viewpoint stresses the necessity of self-purification and moral refinement.