Verse 273 of Surah Al-Baqarah, as a continuation of the discourse on charity, elucidates the characteristics of the chaste poor, the requisite knowledge for benefactors, and Divine awareness of this socio-ritual act. This verse, akin to a brilliant gem within the Divine Word, introduces the chaste poor as a group worthy of almsgiving and, with rhetorical subtlety, establishes knowledge as the key to recognising this group and addressing their needs. The exegesis of this verse adopts a scientific and interdisciplinary approach, exploring its rhetorical, psychological, sociological, and lexical dimensions. Furthermore, it offers constructive critique on scholarly deficiencies within religious studies and proposes strategies for reforming social culture and supporting dignified poor individuals. This treatise, integrating lecture discourse and precise analyses, presents a coherent and profound text for specialised audiences.
لِلْفُقَرَاءِ الَّذِينَ أُحْصِرُوا فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ لَا يَسْتَطِيعُونَ ضَرْبًا فِي الْأَرْضِ يَحْسَبُهُمُ الْجَاهِلُ أَغْنِيَاءَ مِنَ التَّعَفُّفِ تَعْرِفُهُمْ بِسِيمَاهُمْ لَا يَسْأَلُونَ النَّاسَ إِلْحَافًا ۗ وَمَا تُنْفِقُوا مِنْ خَيْرٍ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ بِهِ عَلِيمٌ
Translation: It is for the poor who are restrained in the way of Allah and cannot traverse the land for livelihood. The ignorant regard them as wealthy due to their abstinence. You recognise them by their marks. They do not implore people insistently. And whatever good you spend, indeed Allah is Knowing of it.
This verse, with meticulous structure and remarkable eloquence, describes the chaste poor and introduces knowledge as the instrument for identifying this group. The order of the phrases, which initially appears unexpected, carries subtlety that will be examined below.
One of the rhetorical inquiries concerning this verse pertains to the arrangement of phrases. The two adjectives describing the poorيَحْسَبُهُمُ الْجَاهِلُ أَغْنِيَاءَ مِنَ التَّعَفُّفِ (the ignorant consider them wealthy due to their abstinence) and لَا يَسْأَلُونَ النَّاسَ إِلْحَافًا (they do not implore people insistently)appear logically contiguous but are separated by تَعْرِفُهُمْ بِسِيمَاهُمْ (you recognise them by their marks). This inverted sequence raises a rhetorical question: why has this structure been deliberately reversed, and what wisdom does it embody?
Rhetorical analysis reveals that this order is not accidental but arises from structural and semantic nuances. In the first two phrases, the poor are the subject of judgement: the ignorant misjudge them as wealthy, and the believer identifies them by their marks. In the third phrase, however, the poor are the agents of an ethical action (not pleading insistently). This distinction between the roles of subject and agent justifies the phrase arrangement. In the first two phrases, the poor are passively judged; in the third, they are active moral agents.
Critiques regarding the verses order do not signify flaw but offer an opportunity to uncover the Qur'an's rhetorical artistry. Just as in the phrase بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ where the order of Rahman and Raheem is reversed due to eloquent principles, here too the phrase order follows a sagacious rule. This rule highlights the distinction between the poor as the subject of others judgement and as independent ethical actors.
Objections to the Qur'ans eloquence can be divided into two categories: illusory objections based on superficiality, and genuine objections that are addressed by profound rhetorical analysis. The order in this verse exemplifies the latter, which not only resolves the difficulty but also reveals the depth of the Divine Words rhetorical engineering.
Verse 273 of Surah Al-Baqarah, through precise structure and unparalleled eloquence, delineates the chaste poor and recognises knowledge as the key to identifying and supporting them. The apparently unexpected phrase order is justified by analysing the roles of the poor as subject and agent, exposing the Qur'ans rhetorical engineering. This section emphasises the necessity of scientific and specialised approaches in Quranic exegesis and discourages superficial and populist treatments of the Divine Word.
The verse contrasts يَحْسَبُهُمُ (the ignorant consider) with تَعْرِفُهُمْ (you know them), thereby presenting two levels of perception. Assumption is a superficial imagination indicative of ignorance and negligence, leading the ignorant to mistakenly deem the poor as affluent. Conversely, knowledge, embodied in تَعْرِفُهُمْ بِسِيمَاهُمْ (you recognise them by their marks), is a profound understanding unveiling the true identity of the poor.
Assumption, inferior to knowledge and reliant on external appearances, contrasts with knowledge which transcends superficiality, engaging in identity recognition and individuation. The ignorant, lacking precision and influenced by the poor's abstinence, fall into fallacy, perceiving them as wealthy. The believer, endowed with insight and knowledge, discerns the poor from both their outward and inward signs (sim).
The phrase تَعْرِفُهُمْ بِسِيمَاهُمْ refers to physiognomy and facial psychology. The Qur'an, by highlighting external signs (sim), presents the face as key to identifying personal identity. In body language psychology, the face and feet are pivotal for identity recognition. Even ear ridges, without direct sight, can provide identifying features, although external signs such as skin colour may be misleading.
This Qur'anic emphasis on sim demonstrates the Divine Words advanced precedence in psychological sciences. Precise knowledge that surpasses misleading appearances is the key to recognising the chaste poor. This recognition addresses not only the Prophet but also believers endowed with insight, enabling them to identify genuine needy individuals.
The phrase مِنَ التَّعَفُّفِ indicates self-restraint and preservation of the poors dignity. Abstinence, as a spiritual shield, prevents the poor from expressing need or humiliation. This attribute contrasts with إِلْحَاف (insistence) which is material supplication; it points to spiritual chastity and modesty. The chaste poor, controlling their poverty like a patient concealing pain, maintain their dignity. However, if abstinence is not accompanied by timely support, it becomes like a fragile covering prone to tearing, leading to begging or moral deviation.
Poverty is not merely the lack of financial resources but also stems from the absence of knowledge within society. Philanthropists, despite abundant means, often waste resources on non-essential matters due to lack of insight. A thousand-unit donation with knowledge is more effective than billions without discernment. Knowledge is the key to proper allocation and addressing the needs of the chaste poor.
The Imams, relying on knowledge and identifying the genuine poor by their marks, provided a model for targeted charity. This knowledge, transcending ignorant assumption, reduces poverty not only monetarily but through understanding and insight.
This section elucidated the distinction between assumption and knowledge, underscoring insights role in recognising and supporting the chaste poor. Abstinence, as a noble attribute, preserves the poors dignity but requires societys knowledge-based support. Facial psychology and external signs are Qur'anic tools for detecting genuine need, which with knowledge, lead to effective charity.
By emphasising لَا يَسْأَلُونَ النَّاسَ إِلْحَافًا (they do not implore people insistently), the verse distinguishes the chaste poor from professional beggars. Ilhf, meaning asking with theatricality and exaggeration of poverty, is an act the chaste poor avoid. Yet professional begging, sometimes evolving into a lucrative industry, deviates from genuine poverty and exploits peoples emotions.
For example, an individual with a broken leg continued begging post-recovery with a fake cast, turning it into a business. In other cases, professional beggars with complex organisation generate significant income. This phenomenon indicates deviation from genuine poverty and the necessity of knowledge to discern true need.
Societies lacking sufficient knowledge squander resources on non-essential matters. Well-intentioned philanthropists, due to absence of insight, frequently engage in ostentatious or ineffective charity. This critique stresses the importance of informed and purposeful resource allocation. An intelligent and insightful society, recognising the chaste poor, can sustainably reduce poverty.
The narration <
