صادق خادمی

وب‌سایت مرکزی
وب‌سایت مرکزی SadeghKhademi.ir خانه صفحه اصلی چت آرشیو آثار منابع و تحقیقات ارتباط با ما فرم تماس
در حال بارگذاری ...
منوی دسته بندی
← BACK TO LIBRARY

Exegetical and Socio-Theological Interpretation of Quran 2:286: A Perspective on the Essence of the Self and the Maturation of the Ummah






Exegetical and Socio-Theological Analysis of Quran 2:286


Introduction

Verse 286 of Surah Al-Baqarah, as the concluding passage of this blessed chapter, portrays a profound supplication from the believers, wherein they beseech Almighty God for the facilitation of duties, the lifting of burdensome loads, and the forgiveness of sins. This verse, by focusing on the concept of the self (nafs) and the internal content of the human being, distances itself from superficiality and formalism, addressing instead individual and collective responsibilities within the Divine order. An analysis of this verse from theological, psychological, and sociological perspectives opens a novel window toward understanding the Divine wisdom in regulating duties and the role of social evolution in Islamic law. This treatise, employing a scientific and systematic approach, examines the profound meanings of this verse and critiques the culture of superficiality in the Islamic community, utilising distinguished allegories to elucidate the concepts for a specialised audience.

Section One: Text and Translation of the Verse

رَبَّنَا وَلَا تَحْمِلْ عَلَيْنَا إِصْرًا كَمَا حَمَلْتَهُ عَلَى الَّذِينَ مِنْ قَبْلِنَا ۚ رَبَّنَا وَلَا تُحَمِّلْنَا مَا لَا طَاقَةَ لَنَا بِهِ ۚ وَاعْفُ عَنَّا وَاغْفِرْ لَنَا وَارْحَمْنَا ۚ أَنْتَ مَوْلَانَا فَانْصُرْنَا عَلَى الْقَوْمِ الْكَافِرِينَ

Our Lord, impose not upon us a burden like that which You imposed upon those before us. Our Lord, lay not upon us that which we have no ability to bear. Pardon us, forgive us, and have mercy upon us. You are our Protector, so help us against the disbelieving people.

This verse is a supplication through which believers request from the Almighty that their duties be proportionate to the ordinary human capacity and that they be spared the heavy burdens imposed upon former nations and the tasks beyond endurance. The emphasis on the self (nafs) and the repetition of the pronoun na (meaning us) in this verse indicate a focus on the internal content of the human being and the collective identity of the Ummah.

Section Two: Theological and Epistemological Analysis of the Verse

Distinction Between Tahammul and Tahmil

Within the verse, two expressions, l tamil and l tuammiln, are utilised, each referring to an aspect of duty. L tamil denotes duties within ordinary human capacity, such as avoiding a particular path or observing certain simple ordinances. Conversely, l tuammiln refers to duties beyond ordinary human capacity, such as the command kill yourselves (اقْتُلُوا أَنْفُسَكُمْ) imposed on former nations in previous scriptures.

Key point: The distinction between tahammul (bearing) and tahmil (imposing) highlights Divine wisdom in regulating duties according to ordinary human capacity and prevents the imposition of unbearable burdens.

The Concept of Isr and qah

The term isr refers to burdensome yet bearable obligations, whereas m l qah lan bihi denotes obligations beyond normal human capacity. This distinction signifies Divine justice and mercy in assigning duties that align with human natural capacity.

Key point: Isr and qah stress the alignment of Divine duties with natural human ability, reflecting Divine wisdom in the facilitation of Sharia.

Duty and Ordinary Capacity

Divine obligations within the Islamic system are calibrated according to the ordinary capacity of humans, not exceptional or extraordinary abilities. For instance, refraining from fishing or choosing a particular route falls within ordinary human capacity, whereas killing oneself or burdensome duties imposed on former nations exceed this capacity.

Key point: Divine duties in Islam correspond to ordinary human capability and avoid imposing extraordinary or insupportable tasks.

Critique of Unscientific Exegeses

Many traditional Quranic commentaries, due to a lack of scientific and sociological approaches, have distanced themselves from the profound meanings of the verses by adding unnecessary prefixes and suffixes. This approach impedes precise comprehension of the theological and psychological concepts within the verses.

Key point: Unscientific exegeses, by introducing unwarranted interpretations, fall short of understanding the sociological and psychological dimensions of the verses.

Section Three: Sociological and Psychological Analysis

Difference Between the Islamic Ummah and Preceding Nations

The supplication like that which You imposed upon those before us indicates the distinction between Islamic Sharia and previous religions. Former nations, such as the Children of Israel, received heavier duties due to the frailty of social (qb) and effective (fil) requisites. Conversely, the Islamic Ummah, owing to intellectual, cultural, and technological maturation, has been exempted from such heavy duties.

Key point: The evolution of the social and effective requisites of the Islamic Ummah has removed the necessity for the onerous duties imposed on former nations, emphasising facilitation in Sharia.

Critique of Arrogance

Attributing facilitation of duties solely to the presence of the Prophet or the Imams is a misguided perspective that implies arrogance. This viewpoint contradicts Divine justice, which adjusts obligations based on ordinary capacity and social development.

Key point: Facilitation of duties results from the social and effective maturation, not from a special privilege of the Islamic Ummah.

Social and Effective Requisites

The difference between the Islamic Ummah and previous nations lies in two dimensions: the social (qb) society and human conditions and the effective (fil) Divine guidance. The Islamic society, through intellectual, cultural, and technological progress, has transcended the limitations of previous nations, while its effective guidance, via the Prophet and Imams, has attained superiority.

Key point: The social and effective maturation of the Islamic Ummah has shaped Sharia to correspond with human capacities.

Social Evolution and Its Effect on Duty

Social advancements, such as ease of travel compared to the past, exemplify the social maturation of the Islamic community. This evolution obviates the need for heavy duties, such as suicide or deprivation of good provisions, prevalent in prior Sharia systems.

Key point: Social evolution has eased duties in accordance with new human capacities.

Section Four: Critique of the Culture of Superficiality

Formalism Versus the Essence of the Self

Verse 286 of Surah Al-Baqarah, with its repeated emphasis on na (approximately 20 times in this verse and preceding verses), focuses on the internal essence of the human being (nafs), rather than external actions. The Islamic society, due to tendencies towards superficiality (hypocrisy and ostentation), has neglected internal contents such as purity, courage, and perfection.

Key point: The verses emphasis on nafs and na indicates the primacy of internal essence over external acts.

Critique of Excessive Mourning Rituals

The Islamic society displays a proclivity towards sorrowful expressions, such as excessive mourning ceremonies, while neglecting religious joy. This inclination can be construed as a sign of psychological imbalance and cultural deficiency within the religious ethos.

Key point: The tendency towards excessive mourning and neglect of religious joy signals a lack of balance in the societal culture.

Critique of Religious Science

Institutions of religious science, due to their focus on externals and neglect of inner content, have been deprived of global influence and necessary credibility. This critique underscores the urgent need for reform in religious education systems.

Key point: Religious institutions must revise their focus towards internal essence and global impact.

Section Five: Historical Experience and Social Lessons

The Imposed War and the Essence of the Self

The imposed war (the Iraq-Iran war), as a social laboratory, demonstrated that ordinary individuals possessing a strong inner essence, unlike ostentatious elites, displayed sacrifice and selflessness. This experience emphasises the importance of the essence of the self during crises.

Key point: The imposed war revealed the value of strong inner essence among ordinary people compared to superficial elites.

Critique of Elites and Social Responsibility

The elites of society, particularly within religious sciences, participated less actively during crises such as the imposed war. This reality highlights their social responsibility and the necessity of their active presence in sacrifice arenas.

Key point: The lack of active elite involvement in crises calls their social responsibility into question.

Hussains Essence: The Paradigm of Sacrifice

Imam Hussain (peace be upon him), by sacrificing his entire being at Karbala, presented a perfect model of the essence of the self. This sacrifice manifests the significance of inner sincerity and authenticity in religious practice.

Key point: Hussains sacrifice is an unparalleled paradigm of complete inner essence in religious practice.

Final Summary

Verse 286 of Surah Al-Baqarah, through the supplication of believers for the facilitation of duties and the plea for forgiveness, offers a theological and sociological system emphasising the inner essence of the human being (nafs) and the social and effective maturation of the Islamic Ummah. Islamic Sharia, considering social progress and the guidance of the Infallibles, distances itself from the heavy duties of former nations and focuses on facilitation and Divine mercy. Nonetheless, the Islamic societys inclination towards superficiality and symbolic mourning has detracted attention from inner qualities such as purity, courage, and perfection. The experience of the imposed war revealed that ordinary individuals with robust inner essence performed acts of sacrifice in contrast to superficial elites. This verse, by stressing the nafs and inviting self-awareness, calls humanity to reflect upon its internal essence and to rectify social afflictions, emphasising the necessity of reconstructing religious culture on the foundations of sincerity and inwardness.

Under the supervision of Sadegh Khademi