صادق خادمی

وب‌سایت مرکزی
وب‌سایت مرکزی SadeghKhademi.ir خانه صفحه اصلی چت آرشیو آثار منابع و تحقیقات ارتباط با ما فرم تماس
در حال بارگذاری ...
منوی دسته بندی
← BACK TO LIBRARY

The Chapter of Expansion in the Journey of Seekers: A Mystical and Qur'anic Analysis

of (May Allah sanctify his soul) Session 370

Introduction: The Essence of Expansion in Mystical Spirituality

In the vast realm of Islamic mysticism, Maqamat al-Sa'ireen (Stations of the Seekers), authored by Khwajah Abdullah Ansari, serves as a luminous beacon, guiding the seeker of divine knowledge. The Chapter of Expansion (Bab al-Insbat), as the final station in the ethical section of this work, presents a profound and multifaceted concept: a magnanimous opening from the Higher to the Lower, which, like a soul-refreshing breeze, leads constricted hearts towards freedom and sincerity. This concept, in both human and divine interactions, is a manifestation of love and the removal of severity, where fear and submission give way to trust and openness. However, the reference by Khwajah to the story of Prophet Musa (Moses) in the Qur'an, due to its grandeur and crisis-laden nature, seems incompatible with the definition of expansion.

Part One: Defining Expansion in Islamic Mysticism

The Definition of Expansion: An Opening in the Realm of Interactions

In both linguistic and mystical terms, Insbat (Expansion) refers to the broadening and opening of spaces in human and divine interactions. This concept, like a door ajar, creates a space where the individual, when facing the Higher, no longer fears expressing their thoughts and emotions freely. Expansion, as if forming a bridge between hearts, transforms severity and authority into love and sincerity.

Key Point: Expansion is a magnanimous opening from the Higher to the Lower, which turns fear and submission into trust and freedom of expression.

Expansion in Human Relationships: A Metaphor of Father and Child

In human relationships, expansion is akin to the behavior of a father who, with a gracious demeanor, grants his child the freedom to express whatever is on their heart, without fear of judgment or reproach. This opening prevents emotional blockage and establishes a relationship grounded in trust and affection. The father, with a kind smile, invites the child to play with his beard, turning a fearful space into one of joy and warmth. This metaphor portrays expansion as a flow from the Higher to the Lower, where the superior figure, by removing severity, creates a platform for open dialogue.

The Unidirectional Nature of Expansion

Expansion is a unidirectional flow from the Higher to the Lower. The ruler, teacher, or parent, with openness and the removal of authority, creates a space in which the lesser individual can express themselves freely, without fear of being judged. This opening, like sunlight falling on the earth, shines without expectation of the earth returning an equal reflection.

Key Point: Expansion is a unidirectional flow from the Higher to the Lower, creating a space for intimacy and ease.

Summary of Part One

Expansion, in Islamic mysticism, is a concept that explains the opening and graciousness in human and divine interactions. This concept, emphasizing a one-way flow from the Higher to the Lower, provides a secure space for free expression, eliminating the fear of authority. Human metaphors, such as the father-child relationship, beautifully depict this concept. However, explaining expansion within a divine context requires a careful examination of Qur'anic references, which will be explored in the following section.

Part Two: Critique of Khwajah's Qur'anic Reference to the Story of Moses (Peace Be Upon Him)

Khwajah's Qur'anic Reference

Khwajah Abdullah Ansari, in the Chapter of Expansion, refers to the story of Prophet Musa (Moses) and his conversation with Allah in the Qur'an. The relevant verses, found in Surah Al-A'raf, particularly verse 155, recount the event where seventy men from the Children of Israel were selected to meet with God and the subsequent events. However, this reference seems incompatible with the concept of expansion due to the grandeur and crisis-laden nature of the story.

Qur'an, Surah Al-A'raf, Verse 155:
"And Musa chose seventy men from his people for Our appointed time, then when the earthquake took them, he said: 'My Lord, if You had willed, You could have destroyed them before, and me as well. Would You destroy us for what the foolish among us have done? It is only Your trial. You mislead whom You will and guide whom You will. You are our protector, so forgive us and have mercy on us, and You are the best of the forgivers.'" (Translation by Fouladwand)

The Crisis in Prophet Musa's Life

This passage in the life of Prophet Musa refers to the most critical moment he faced. After the incident of the golden calf, which led to the deviation of the Children of Israel, Musa encountered multiple challenges: disputes with his brother Harun, accusations of murder, and the loss of trust among his people. These circumstances created a storm that led to his social and psychological isolation. Musa, like a ship stranded in a turbulent sea, struggled to rebuild the trust of his people and prove his righteousness.

Key Point: In this period, Musa (PBUH) was in a state of utter helplessness and isolation, as though facing the social rejection of his people.

Musa's Effort to Rebuild Trust

In an attempt to restore trust and clear his name, Musa selected seventy of the elders and leaders of the Children of Israel to accompany him to the appointed time. This choice, akin to selecting the brightest stars from the nation, was an effort to prove his direct connection with Allah and dispel doubts. However, this action did not lead to expansion, but rather resulted in a tragic outcome.

The Tragedy of the Earthquake and the Death of Seventy Men

At the appointed time, Allah sent a great earthquake, causing the death of seventy of the leaders of the Children of Israel. This event was like a thunderbolt, not only shattering Musa's hopes but also placing him in the position of being accused of the murder of these prominent figures.

Qur'an, Surah Al-A'raf, Verse 155:
"And when the earthquake took them..." (Translation by Fouladwand)

Key Point: The death of seventy leaders due to the divine earthquake intensified Musa's crisis, placing him under suspicion of their murder instead of achieving any form of expansion.

Musa's Majestic Protest to Allah

Amidst this crisis, Musa raised a majestic protest to Allah. As if like a child overwhelmed by intense pressure, he asked why this catastrophe had been attributed to him, questioning why he was placed in a position of blame. This protest, a cry from the depth of his heart, illustrates the immense psychological strain that Musa was under.

Qur'an, Surah Al-A'raf, Verse 155:
"My Lord, if You had willed, You could have destroyed them before, and me as well." (Translation by Fouladwand)

Critique of Divine Justice by Musa

Musa, with a bold and majestic tone, challenged the divine justice. He argued that the destruction of his people due to the foolish actions of some was unjust. This stance, like a sword aimed at the divine justice, reveals the depth of Musa's crisis and the absence of expansion in this narrative.

Qur'an, Surah Al-A'raf, Verse 155:
"Would You destroy us for what the foolish among us have done?" (Translation by Fouladwand)

Key Point: Musa's protest regarding the divine justice, questioning the destruction of his people for the foolishness of some, reflects the absence of expansion in this story.

The Divine Challenge as a Trial: A Critical Examination

Section 1: The Divine Challenge as a Test of Faith

The story of Moses (peace be upon him) and the worship of the calf, along with the resulting upheaval, was considered by him to be a divine trialone that leads to either misguidance or guidance of individuals. This perspective diminishes the responsibility of Samiri and attributes the trial to the will of the Divine. The trial, in this sense, is akin to a challenging phase along the spiritual journey, forcing the seeker to confront their own faith and unveil its true essence.

"It is nothing but Your trial." (Surah Al-A'raf, 7:155)

Moses (peace be upon him), with unwavering conviction, referred the misguidance and guidance of individuals to the absolute will of God. This reasoning appeared to serve as a key unlocking the doors of human responsibility, yet it did not align with the idea of divine generosity and openness.

"You lead astray with it whom You will, and You guide whom You will." (Surah Al-A'raf, 7:155)

Section 2: Concluding the Argument Regarding Divine Will

The citation of the story of Moses (peace be upon him) by Khwaja Abdullah Ansari, due to its grand and turbulent nature, is incompatible with the concept of divine expansion. The narrative, rather than portraying an opening or friendliness, illustrates a scene of objection, catastrophe, and divine majesty. The Quranic verses, emphasizing the trial, misguidance, and destruction, provide no indication of divine expansiveness. In the following section, we will critically examine the Divine actions and the commentator's interpretation.

Section 3: Critique of Divine Behaviour and the Commentator's Interpretation

Lack of Expansiveness in Divine Actions

The divine conduct in the story of Moses (peace be upon him) does not exhibit expansiveness, but rather majesty and might. The death of seventy prominent figures from the tribe and the intensification of Moses (peace be upon him) crisis were like a storm that shattered any hope of resolution. God, in response to Moses (peace be upon him), did not act with a smiling countenance, but with immense majesty.

The divine conduct in this narrative is devoid of any openness or expansiveness and, instead, intensifies Moses (peace be upon him) crisis with grandeur and might.

The Majestic Nature of Moses and God

Moses (peace be upon him), owing to his own majestic spirit, spoke with God in a harsh and protesting manner. Gods response reflected this majesty in return, as though it mirrored Moses' (peace be upon him) own grandeur. This interaction, like a collision between two colossal mountains, left no space for expansiveness.

Comparison of Moses to a Child in Crisis

In this narrative, Moses (peace be upon him) is likened to a child reacting with anger and protest in the face of overwhelming pressures. This metaphor serves as a veil revealing the intensity of the crisis and the absence of any relief.

The Shift in Moses' Tone to Seeking Forgiveness

After his majestic protest, Moses (peace be upon him), recognising the magnitude of the Divine, turned towards repentance and implored for mercy. This shift in tone is akin to a storm-tossed ship returning to a calm shorean attempt to resolve the crisis and restore a relationship based on mercy.

"You are our protector, so forgive us and have mercy on us." (Surah Al-A'raf, 7:155)

Emphasis on Divine Punishment Even After Repentance

Even after Moses (peace be upon him) repentance, God first emphasised punishment, then mercy. This order serves as a scale, positioning majesty before mercy, thereby highlighting the absence of expansiveness in this story.

"My punishment I afflict upon whom I will." (Surah Al-A'raf, 7:156)

Critique of the Commentators Interpretation of Expansiveness

The commentator interprets expansiveness as the denial of the destruction of the people and attributes the trial to God. This interpretation appears to conceal the majestic objection of Moses (peace be upon him) and deviates from the reality of the story.

Misinterpretation of Scholars and Philosophers

The commentators incorrect definition of "scholars and philosophers" for the tribe's leaders indicates a lack of a precise understanding of the verses. The phrase "seventy men" refers to the tribe's leaders and elders, not merely scholars or philosophers.

Distinction Between Trial, Test, and Examination

The trial, meaning challenge and misstep, is distinct from "test" (hidden examination) and "examination" (open test). The commentator, by conflating these concepts, offers an erroneous interpretation of the trial. The trial is akin to a whirlpool, pulling the seeker towards either misguidance or steadfastness.

The trial, as challenge and misstep, differs from test and examination and, in this narrative, refers to the divine will for the separation of the misguided from the guided.

Misrepresentation of Moses Protest by the Commentator

The commentator distorts Moses (peace be upon him) protest against divine justice into a portrayal of openness and expansiveness. This distortion is akin to an artist covering the dark shades of reality with lighter colours.

The Commentators Fear of Speaking the Truth

The commentator, due to doctrinal concerns, refrains from directly addressing Moses (peace be upon him) protest against God, redirecting the interpretation towards compatibility with the infallibility of the prophets. This approach serves as a veil, hiding the majestic truth of the narrative.

The Commentators Influence by Talmudic Interpretations

The commentators interpretation is heavily influenced by Talmudic sources. This influence sometimes leads to the addition of unnecessary and complex explanations, akin to branches and leaves added to the trunk of a tree.

Section 4: Redefining Expansiveness in Mystical and Social Contexts

Expansiveness Versus Defeat

Expansiveness, in contrast to defeat and fear, represents the creation of space to alleviate anxiety and foster trust. This concept is like a breeze clearing away the dark clouds of defeat from the sky of the heart.

The Need for Expansiveness in the Contemporary World

The contemporary world, beset by crises of grandeur and social breakdowns, necessitates expansiveness. However, this openness should not lead to passivity or negligence of realities; it should, instead, act as a guiding light in the darkness of crises.

The Commentator's Definition of Expansiveness

The commentator defines expansiveness as freedom of expression and the removal of fear of majesty. While this definition is theoretically accurate, it does not align with the chosen Quranic story. Expansiveness, in this sense, is like a stream flowing from high mountains to humble plains.

Expansiveness, as freedom of expression and the removal of fear of majesty, is theoretically sound but incompatible with the story of Moses (peace be upon him).

Divine Mercy Despite Majesty

Despite the majesty of God, His mercy ultimately encompassed Moses (peace be upon him). This mercy was like rain that quenches the thirsty land after the storm. However, at this juncture, expansiveness did not manifest as divine openness.

God as the Divider of the Mighty

God is both merciful and mighty, revealing His grandeur in the face of oppression and disobedience. This image is akin to a painting displaying both aspects of divine mercy and majesty.

The Most Majestic Confrontation of Moses in the Quran

This narrative represents the most unique confrontation of a prophet with God in the Quran. The intensity of Moses (peace be upon him) protest and the mighty response of God distinguish this episode from other Quranic stories.

The story of Moses (peace be upon him) in this episode represents the most majestic confrontation between a prophet and God in the Quran, with no sign of expansiveness therein.

Summary of Section 4

Expansiveness, as a mystical and social concept, creates space for openness and trust, in contrast to defeat and fear. However, the story of Moses (peace be upon him), due to its majestic nature, cannot serve as a foundation for explaining this concept. Although divine mercy ultimately embraced Moses (peace be upon him), the divine majesty took precedence over expansiveness in this episode.

Conclusion: Reevaluating Expansiveness

The concept of expansiveness in "Maqamat al-Sa'irin" offers a profound and multifaceted perspective for seekers: a generous opening from the higher to the lower, transforming fear and defeat into trust and intimacy. However, Khwaja Abdullah Ansari's reference to the story of Moses (peace be upon him) from the Quran is incompatible with this concept due to its grand and turbulent nature. Moses' (peace be upon him) protest against divine justice, the catastrophe of the upheaval, and God's mighty response make this story one of the most majestic encounters in the Quran. The commentator's interpretation, distorting Moses' (peace be upon him) protest and confusing the concepts of trial, test, and examination, deviates from the narrative's reality. This work, through the rewording of 's discourses and detailed analyses, endeavours to redefine expansiveness within a mystical and social context. Expansiveness should rightly be interpreted in a space of love and openness, not within a context of crisis and grandeur. This work, as a comprehensive and scholarly source, is provided for researchers in Islamic mysticism to guide future studies.

Edited by Sadegh Khadami